Joint offering · Transcriptomics
Bulk, single-cell and spatial each answer a question the other two cannot. Run together, on the same samples and against the same design, they give you the whole picture instead of three partial ones.
GenXMap covers the full transcriptomic spectrum in France — all three modalities designed, run and interpreted as a single programme, not three services sold side by side. Bulk on our own platforms in Marseille, single-cell with Parean Biotechnologies in Saint-Malo, spatial with Explicyte in Bordeaux, under one contract and one PhD-level project lead.
The three are not competing methods. They are three angles on the same biology, and the gap between them is usually where the answer sits.
The population average, reliably and at scale: robust differential expression, enough depth for low-abundance transcripts, and the statistical power that comes with sequencing many samples. It cannot tell you which cells produced the signal.
Resolves the average into the cell populations that make it up: which subsets shift, which appear, which disappear. It cannot tell you where those cells were sitting in the tissue.
Puts expression back into the tissue with its architecture intact: what is next to what, at the tumour margin, inside a niche. It trades depth for position.
Each modality is available on its own from someone. Bought that way, the three never quite line up.
Group sizes and time points chosen for a bulk experiment are rarely the ones a single-cell or spatial run needs. Two of the three datasets end up underpowered for their own question.
Different aliquots, different handling, sometimes different animals or patients. The modalities then disagree, and you cannot tell whether that is biology or logistics.
Three reports, each internally consistent, that you are left to reconcile. The cross-modality reading, which is the reason you ran all three, is the one nobody delivers.
One modality each, one design, one sample set, one project lead accountable for the whole chain.
Extraction, library preparation and sequencing on our Marseille platforms, then the bioinformatics, statistics and AI-assisted integration that pulls the three modalities into one reading.
Based in Saint-Malo, specialised in deep immune phenotyping and multi-omics data analysis, with wet laboratories and a data science unit.
A precision oncology and immuno-oncology CRO in Bordeaux, bringing spatial transcriptomics alongside its oncology and immuno-oncology models.
One design covering all three modalities, one sample set split across them, and methods, parameters and thresholds documented across the whole chain.
What the programme must establish, and which of the three modalities actually bears on it.
Groups, time points and controls chosen so bulk, single-cell and spatial are each adequately powered.
Material collected once and split across the three routes, with a documented chain of custody.
Bulk in Marseille, single-cell in Saint-Malo, spatial in Bordeaux, on a shared timeline.
Versioned pipelines, cross-modality integration and AI-assisted prioritisation.
A single report that reads the three together and answers the question you started from.
The bulk platforms behind it are the ones published on OMICS4, where the offering is also listed as a combo platform. See also our wet-lab platforms and computational biology and AI.
Where the treatment effect has to be read in the tumour microenvironment: which immune subsets shift, and where they sit relative to the tumour. See immuno-oncology.
Where a signature has to survive contact with clinical metadata and an independent cohort, and be traceable to a cell type and a location. See precision medicine.
Biotechs and academic groups that need all three modalities contracted once, with a PhD-level scientist accountable for the reading.
Common questions about running bulk, single-cell and spatial together.
It depends on the question, not on which method is newest. Bulk RNA-seq gives you the population average with the depth and statistical power that come from sequencing many samples, and it is the right answer more often than people expect. Single-cell resolves that average into the cell populations behind it. Spatial puts expression back into the tissue with its architecture intact. If your question spans two of those, running them on separate designs usually costs you the comparison.
That is the point of the 360° programme. One experimental design is agreed up front so bulk, single-cell and spatial are each adequately powered, material is collected once and split across the three routes, and the chain of custody is documented throughout. Buying the three separately normally means three designs and three sample sets that no longer compare.
That is precisely what GenXMap set out to make available. Bulk RNA-seq runs on our own platforms in Marseille, single-cell with Parean Biotechnologies in Saint-Malo, spatial transcriptomics with Explicyte in Bordeaux, under one contract with one PhD-level project lead accountable for the whole chain and for the final interpretation. The full transcriptomic spectrum, designed and read as one thing, is the offering — not three services sold side by side.
One project lead, at GenXMap, for the whole programme. Disagreement between modalities is often the most informative part of the result, and reading it requires knowing how each sample was generated. That is why the interpretation is not split three ways.
Yes. An existing dataset, from an earlier study or another provider, is analysed on its own terms. What decides the work is the biological question and the metadata that came with the data, not who ran the sequencer.
Bulk sequencing runs in our Marseille laboratories, hosted at the Méditerranée Infection building. Single-cell runs in Saint-Malo and spatial in Bordeaux. Samples and data stay in the European Union, with a documented chain of custody from intake to delivery.
Have a transcriptomics programme in mind?